I looked at it a few months ago and sort of concluded that the Tucano was a better choice based primarily on the issue of an already operational aircraft versus a development of the existing T-6 trainer which has only been prototyped.
Here is a detailed analysis and while it offers a lot more information, I think I'm still on with the Tucano:
Bigger Might Be Better But Familiar Carries Weight
![]() |
| Prototype AT-6B Texan |


I vote to scratch the whole program. It's a lot of money for so few aircraft because the overall program expense is high. This is a good opportunity to cut our losses in AFG. Let them choose their aircraft and figure out how to pay for it.
ReplyDeleteI say resurrect the Staggerwing!
ReplyDeleteExternal gun on the Texan is a showstopper for me.
ReplyDeleteI say scrap the whole program. Embraer has managed to sell Super Tucanos around the globe before this contract. I am sure they could sell direct to Afghanistan.
ReplyDeleteThe USAF portion now totals a mere 15 aircraft, it is not economical to contemplate. Keep the A-10Cs flying for CAS/COIN.
In a broader context I have to wonder what is wrong with the USAF. First KC-X, then CSAR-X, and now this program beset with problems.
@Anna, the USAF has gone downhill ever since Raz and I retired (g).
ReplyDelete