That, however, did not stop the Times from allowing their squad of anonymous informants to all but openly accuse this American hero of adultery and favoritism toward a female lobbyist with no proof.
He handled that with dignity, I must say. Andthe latest, refusing to "mold" his editorial to reflect more favorably on Obama's.
That, however, did not stop the Times from allowing their squad of anonymous informants to all but openly accuse this American hero of adultery and favoritism toward a female lobbyist with no proof.
ReplyDeleteHe handled that with dignity, I must say. Andthe latest, refusing to "mold" his editorial to reflect more favorably on Obama's.