Friday, March 12, 2010

Coincidence?

Do coincidences happen? Of course they do. Do they happen often? No. Do they happen in a time frame which fits the agenda of dismantling a major competitor of Government Motors through law suits, regulation and a campaign of distrust? In this America they do.

Now consider for a moment what you do when something frightening and unexpected and possibly even life-threatening occurs? That's right, you don't deal with it, you fish out your cell phone and make a call.

Read about the Prius event:

Why Didn't You Turn Off the Ignition and/or Put It In Neutral?

For those who skimmed through them, here are some interesting points:

He called 911 and reported that his gas pedal had become stuck, and spoke to dispatchers in two calls that spanned 23 minutes.


He made TWO calls? The runaway car incident took 23 minutes? What does that tell you?

He planned to be sure to have the calls become an issue. He set up the situation in a place where he could run at high speed without traffic lights, congestion or unnegotiable curves. Can you think of a place where you could run your car flat out for 23 minutes straight? You've got to plan ahead for it.

Don Esmond, senior vice president of automotive operations for Toyota Motor Sales, said all Priuses are equipped with a computer system that cuts power to the wheels if the brake and gas pedals are depressed at the same time — something Sikes was doing.


When was the last time in your vehicle that you drove it with BOTH the brake and gas pedals depressed? Could you hold that posture for 23 minutes while diverting your attention to make a couple of calls?

When asked why he didn't simply put the car in neutral, Sikes responded: "You had to be there. I might go into reverse. I didn't know if the car would flip. I had no idea how it would react."


Your car is acclerating wildly and your demise is imminent but rather than take the car out of gear or turn the ignition off you worry about not doing it right?

Give me a break! This is a setup! Even an enviro-geek who would buy and drive a Prius wouldn't be this stupid. It was planned, orchestrated, and promoted.


Sikes Update:

Unwanted Scrutiny Reveals Much

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Business Opportunity

Ever wonder what would happen if you didn't turn in your homework on time?

Well, enforcement is apparently going to get a bit tougher:

Fourteen Inch, Ghost Ring, 12-Gauge Tactical Only

How did that model get selected?

LOP are designated as the only shotguns authorized for ED based on compatibility with ED existing shotgun inventory, certified armor and combat training and protocol, maintenance, and parts.


Well that makes sense. It's a compatibility issue with existing armor, combat training and shotgun inventories of the educrats.

There's got to be some application here, but it isn't jumping out at me. Arne Duncan's department doesn't have any responsibility for security in schools anywhere. And his office buildings are protected by local police and contract personnel.

Why?

What's Your Sign?

It is a decennial year and that means we are going to be subject to the census. There is a lot of grumbling about what is on the forms and whether or not they (meaning the Congress) have the right to ask those questions.

We know that the composition of the House is determined by population. The legislatively set fixed number of 435 House seats is "apportioned" among the states based on their population. Districts are established within states to maintain approximately equal numbers of citizens in each representative district. People move and the population grows so every ten years we count and then some states gain a seat or two and some lose.

The US Constitution establishes the requirement for the census with this simple statement:

Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.


So, every ten years we get counted. The key clause is the last one. "in such manner as they shall by law direct." Who gets counted? What gets asked? How is it done? Must you respond?

That's more complex. I honestly thought it was basically a body count. I don't like to discuss how much income I've got or how many TVs or whether my toilets flush with total strangers. Must I respond?

Here's the reference to the body of law which governs:

"Persons" and the "Necessary & Proper Clause" and More, Oh My!

Notice that there is no mention of citizenship. Since the Fourteenth Amendment made the former slaves citizens and offered equal protection under the law, we count bodies, not citizens. A person is a person, period. Wherever that leads us.

The combination of the power to conduct the census in "such manner as they (the Congress) shall by law direct" and the blanket authorization of the "necessary and proper clause" allow the census to delve into questions which we undoubtedly might find intrusive. "The law is an ass...", Mr. Bumble was heard to say, but it remains the law.

Should we exercise civil disobedience and skip questions we don't approve of or simply opt out of responding? There are legal penalties for doing that. If, as a component of your civil disobedience you are willing to face those penalties then go for greatness. Otherwise, grin and bear it...and meanwhile work to restore some sense to our laws.

The Role of Government

A topic which never seems to be raised any more is one which should be central to all political discussion. What is the proper role of government?

There are different levels of government in our federal system and obviously that would mean different roles. But the essential question is still relevant. What should government be doing? And, maybe more critical, what should government stay out of?

Why is that important? It is important because the more government is involved in making the choices in our lives, the more intrusive and repressive it can be. The essence of our freedom is tied to the role of government.

Take a look at where we are in our national debates. We are in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Should government be involved in defending us from threats which are generated in those regions? Clearly the role of defending the nation is a proper one for government. The question can then be where it is best done and so the debate can proceed with clear understanding that this is something government should be handling.

Should government be determining whether or not a woman can have an abortion? Ahh, a more complex question. If you understand on one side of the argument the position is that the role of government should not involve intervention in significant decisions between a woman and her significant other, her family, her healthcare provider and her faith then you might be pro-choice. If you understand on the other side of the argument that a proper role of government is protection for those who cannot protect themselves, then you might be pro-life. But understanding the role of government is essential.

Failure to stop at the beginning of every debate and ask about the proper role of government can give us this:


Nanny Says No-No to Tasty Food

Someone needs to tell Assemblyman Ortiz that the preparation of restaurant foods, beyond maintaining of health standards, is none of his business.

Jack Bauer Results

Recent capture of the #2 Taliban leader in Afghanistan and interrogation by the Pakistanis give this revealing picture:

Chirp, Chirp, Chirp, Tweet, Tweet, Hummmmm

It has reported during a brief interlude in his screaming that he asked for intervention by US Attorney General Eric Holder. He said something about his rights having not yet been read to him.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Real Congressmen of Washington DC

With the football season six weeks gone and a month to go before baseball starts out the homestead gets real quiet on Sunday afternoons. I tend to cocoon with a book or the computer and SWMBO grabs the remote and goes on a reality marathon. She's become addicted to "Real Housewives of Somewhere" which comes in a half-dozen flavors of regional floozies. You've got New York, New Jersey, Atlanta, Orange County and I don't know where else.

What's obvious immediately is they aren't real, they aren't housewives and their chronological age is well beyond their psychological maturity. They are rich, surgically enhanced, spoiled and bitchy.

Which makes this new TV production a natural:


Filming Of Congressional Reality Show Disrupts Committee Meeting

Hoist on His Own Petard

Five days ago it was NY Congressman Eric Massa under pressure about inappropriate actions with a staffer. Then it was a spontanous resignation for a sequence of reasons ranging from the pressure, some cancer issues, healthcare strong-arming and a conspiracy by the Bamster's legions. It peaked with a radio talk show interview that titillated with the images of a naked man confrontation in the Capital gym shower-room.

Maybe there was something there. Yesterday Glen Beck brought Massa to his show for a full hour. I watched a lot of it. It was amazing. The former congressman is delusional at best and incoherent at worst. The evidence once again points to the question of whether the American electorate is really intelligent enough to be making choices in a democracy.

Here's the Washington Post take on it. It reads pretty much like I saw it, or maybe even soft-pedals the melt-down a bit.

Talking in Circles, Reveling in Adolescence, Grasping at Straws

Maybe the most remarkable statement was Beck's last words. These were uttered at the close of the show while he sat across the table from Massa. I wonder what the man thought at the end of his performance.

In the show's waning minutes, Beck surrendered. "America, I've got to shoot straight with you," he said, looking into the camera. "I think I've wasted your time. I think this is the first time I have wasted an hour of your time, and I apologize for that."


The show's over folks. Move along. Nothng to see here.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Music For Your Day

He brings out talent in people:

We Few...

Iowahawk paraphrases Henry V on the eve before the battle.

The Band of Brothers Is Very Different Now

When his muse visits he has an incredible talent. Enjoy.

Little League Hoplophobes

The idiocy of schools suspending six-year olds for pointing fingers at other students as a "gun" has become commonplace. If those school boards and wussified principals had been in Wilson Park when I was growing up they would have soiled their bloomers and collapsed in a quaking mass of jelly. Six-guns and Lugers, rifles and home-built simulations of "machine guns" abounded as we chose to play cowboys or war or super-heroes on a rampage in the grass and bushes. Lots of pointing, "bang-banging", ricochet whistles and of course overly dramatic dying followed by click-click bandaging and "you're all better, now."

Today we've got generations conditioned to fear blue steel and brass. We would rather succomb than resist.

But, how do you explain this:

Little League Says No Thanks to Sponsor

OK, that's their privilege I guess if they are going to be pristine about whose logo gets displayed on a team t-shirt. But if Constitution Arms is controversial wouldn't a chicken joint named "Cluck U" be a bit of a double entendre for nine-year-olds? Or having your fifth grader take the field promoting Joe's Wine and Spirits?

Just asking.

Much Ado About Nothing

You've heard about it already, I'm sure. Dan Rather, no friend of Republicans or the right in America on Chris Matthews show, no friend of Republicans...but I digress:



Is there a limit in a nation which supposedly has speech and political expression protected by the First Amendment to what will be proscribed as a racist slur?

Two days ago it was felony charges against two university morons who sprinkled cotton balls on the quadrangle lawn at the University of Missouri. You see cotton balls recall slaves working in the fields of the rebellious South and picking cotton. Can't put cotton in front of an African-American.

Maybe it has been the deep offense of displaying a rope before a minority student because that was the tool of lynch mobs a hundred years ago. Can't have ropes and blacks in the same room.

Watermelon is a fruit and a refreshing treat in the summer. It isn't racist. Fried chicken is a marginally unhealthy American favorite saturated in breading and fat, nothing more. The word "niggardly" means parsimonious or cheap. It isn't a racist slur.

Nothing seems to be too absurd to still be capable of providing racist offense. How about discounting toys which aren't selling as fast as similar models in a different color?

Is Black Barbie Really Worth Less?

Sometimes, as Freud pointed out, a cigar is just a cigar...ooops, inadvertent anti-Clinton joke. Sorry. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

Rather quite accurately points out that the President's articulate skills do not translate into observable mangerial competence. To call a failure a failure and to illustrate your language with a metaphor, even a rural one, isn't racist. It is simply accurate.

Monday, March 08, 2010

Heroes

Aristotle wrote that war ennobles man. The modern position is that war debases us. That’s so much easier to defend and it serves the purpose of excusing us from sacrifice, patriotism or even inconvenience. But an honest person will have to acknowledge that we live in a Hobbesian world and there are forces which would do us great harm. We depend upon special people to emerge to deal with that threat. We call them heroes.

A hero doesn’t plan to be a hero. He doesn’t seek out heroic opportunities usually but neither does he avoid them. He seldom will tell you he is a hero either before or after the events. America has been fortunate to have many heroes over the life of our republic. It may be time to wonder whether we’ve used up our supply or whether heroism is still possible in a confusing world.

There are no typical heroes. Some live heroic lives and some have but one opportunity to make that transcendental leap into the pages of history. It takes doing something beyond oneself. It takes courage and capability. Heroes often exhibit leadership even when they aren’t responsible for leading at that moment. When a leader is also a hero you’ve got something special.

America seems in need of heroes now or possibly we are in need of revising our thinking to once again value heroes. You can’t detach “Support Our Troops” from supporting our mission or our war. If you wish to remain a free nation, you need to be prepared to go beyond diplomacy when the challenge arises and then you will want those special individuals that somehow emerge to become heroic.

Robin Olds is a stellar example of leader and hero. He didn’t seek out heroic opportunities but rather welcomed the test of his skills against an adversary in defending his country. Known most prominently for his leadership during the bombing campaign against North Vietnam, he could easily have been acknowledged as a hero without ever having been to southeast Asia.

He was an All-American football player at West Point and is enshrined in the National Collegiate Football Hall of Fame. Noteworthy but not classically heroic.

He became a P-38 fighter pilot upon graduation from the Academy and got to Europe a few weeks before D-Day. In nine short months he rose from new Lt. wingman in his squadron to squadron commander with 12.5 air-to-air victories. That would be heroic by most standards.

At war’s end he entered the first US jet fighter squadron and became part of the first jet demonstration team that fostered the Thunderbirds. Along the way he set speed records and was runner-up in the Thompson Trophy Race. In a twist befitting a war hero and dashing jet pilot, he met and fell in love with movie star Ella Raines. That tumultuous union would challenge him for the next 25 years.

When the air war in Vietnam was blundering along with severe losses from inexperience and lack of coherent direction, Robin grabbed the reins of the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing in Thailand and demonstrated that leaders get out in front to set the example for their troops. In the process he established the traditions of the fighter force that cause young pilots today to don a small tab on their flight suits, usually on a Friday afternoon that simply says WWRD. It’s a play on the religious theme, but it reflects a standard of skill, leadership and behavior for their future.

Those few achievements merely scratch the surface of what the man did during his lifetime. He wasn’t the only hero of the period and he would be quick to point out exaggerations to the record when he would hear people recounting “Robin stories.” He was hardly humble but he was never arrogant. It was a thrill for a younger pilot to have Robin throw his arm over your shoulder, embrace you and simply say, “Warrior!” You knew you had arrived.

Will there ever be another Robin Olds? It’s harder to be heroic today. We’ve become too politically correct, too reluctant to simply say that our goal is victory. We benefit from the technology that reduces the risk of flying combat and increases the effectiveness of our weaponry. We seldom face an enemy that comes to the arena to challenge us in battle. Today the battle is waged by terrorist acts and propaganda. We criminalize and demean the heroes and simultaneously enable the miscreants who seek to destroy us. We may never see another Robin Olds.

Christina Olds and Ed Rasimus compilation of memories and writings of Robin Olds will be released on April 13, 2010. “Fighter Pilot: Memoirs of Legendary Ace Robin Olds” from St. Martin’s Press, New York NY, 2010.

Saturday, March 06, 2010

Rocket Science 101

Apparently the powers of reason have been sucked from the brains of the St. Petersburg FL police department. Either that or the news story has failed to report the obvious:

Gun Handling Basics or Did Quick Draw McGraw Have This Problem?

Anybody who has ever been to a cowboy movie knows that you twirl single action revolvers if you are emulating the Ringo Kid. You don't twirl semi-autos.

But, if you do and you shoot your buddy then the police would have to note that if you are on probation for a "drug possession charge" the terms of that probation would preclude firearm possession, particularly if you are seventeen years old. It wouldn't be an unrelated charge.

And accepting the line that "I just found this .40" from a juvenile on probation for drug possession probably is a very weak cover for a burglarly or theft.

Your Future

Those who will not learn the lessons of history are destined to repeat them...

It is fiscally irresponsible to believe that you can continue to gain re-election by the simple mechanism of handing out money and benefits to a greedy welfare-entitlement society. You might be successful at first but eventually you will be discovered and even the worthless of our society will notice.

So far the awareness has been accelerating slowly. But, consider these numbers for a moment:

Doubled Debt in Less Than a Year, Seeking Exponential Increase in Future

There is nothing inherently wrong with debt. We all enter debt to buy cars or homes or finance a child's education. Debt is a tool. But debt becomes toxic when the service of that debt exceeds our ability to pay and simultaneously meet our daily living obligations. If you can't pay the utility bill anymore or buy clothing, you've got too much debt.



Money is simply paper these days, a contract which we accept as a medium of exchange for goods and services. There is no limited quantity asset which backs it as there was when we had a gold standard. That means at some point the solution to oppressive and overwhelming debt is to print your way out of it.

Running the presses overtime devalues your currency, destroys your savings, decimates the value of your labor and demolishes your national credibility. We apparently are reaching a point in the process at which failure to modify behavior will place us inexorably on the path of Weimar Germany. Hyperinflation, economic collapse and then, who knows. We can read the history of Germany to get one possible path and it isn't a pretty one.

Throw another shovel full of money on the fire, dear, I feel a chill in the air.

Saturday Morning Classic Rocker

It was the spring of 1966 and I was still at Nellis AFB having the time of my life learning how to drive the F-105 Thunderchief. Las Vegas was growing, but I-15 still hadn't been cut and the "Strip" had empty spaces between the hotels. There was a lot of amazing entertainment in the lounge bars and even the major productions were only ten bucks which included two drinks.

The Sands hotel had the Ike and Tina Turner Review and it was a mandatory stop around midnight on a week-end. She was introduced as "the hardest working woman in show business" and she well could have been. The band was tight and the funniest part was the single, short white guy with shoulder length hair standing in the brass line with a baritone sax as big as he was. I wondered what it was like traveling with that group.

She didn't do the "nice and rough" spiel in those days, but she did the song just like this:

Friday, March 05, 2010

Tips of Icebergs

I heard about it this morning when I walked past the telly and Fox News was reporting an investigation that two US Navy ships raced each other on the high seas. Well, duh, was my first reaction. You've got warships which are designed for maneuvering and hopefully bursts of speed. You've got virtually unlimited space in the Pacific for a little drag race for bragging rights. It doesn't seem like something to get worked up about unless we're back to political correctness 101 and someone trying to make points against the military. Boys will be boys.

Guided Missile Cruiser Races Destroyer, Winner Not Revealed

But, I stumbled when I read the brief news piece. The cruiser was skippered by a female. Nothing wrong with that in today's military. If she can do the job. But, I had to do a quick search on the Captain's name, Holly Graf when the item also said she was relieved of command last month. There's more to the story.

It seems that Capt. Holly is spoiled little sis of Rear Admiral Robin Graf and that there's a certain Queeg aura about her:

Spitting, Tantrums, Death Threats and Life at Sea

I would like to know if the itinerary for the Cowpens was including stops at Tahiti to pick up some breadfruit. Rum, the lash and sodomy are so passe in the US Navy, but that doesn't mean blatant abuse isn't still available for the chosen few.

Thursday, March 04, 2010

An Inadvertent Truth

Often in politics an individual's core beliefs may not benefit their position if exposed to the light of day. It is unfortunate but true. If they told us what they really intend for our future we would not tolerate them. Occasionally however their core is so ingrained that they blurt it out without realizing.

Read this from former Dallas mayor, now Obama minion, Ron Kirk:

Texas Secession Not Funny

It was several months ago, but apparently it is now Kirk's job to refresh our memory since Gov. Rick Perry swept the ill-advised candidacy of Sen. Kay Hutchison into the dustbin of history Tuesday. Kirk is supposed to caution us about a nut-job. Perry, in a stump speech, pointed out that Texas was doing better than most states in the recession and we might benefit from invoking the secession clause of our original agreement on admission to the union. An independent state of Texas has a certain resonance, doesn't it.

Did you catch the Kirk stumble?

The appeal to racism might be standard fare from the administration, but that isn't it. There's nothing racist about TX independence.

The comment about joblessness is specious. The nation's unemployment rate is hovering at 10% and Texas is roughly two percentage points lower and has been throughout. That's a false hood, but it isn't the underlying philosophy which drives him.

"I wish those of you in the press would then ask, even though it's tongue in cheek, so what does this mean then, for a state that unfortunately ranks in the bottom, investment in education and health care for our kids, leads the nation in the number of people of unemployed, and you want to pull out of the country?" he said.


The education canard is one that I examine in my State & Local Government class regularly. Spending doesn't equate with quality education and comparisions of state per capita spending don't compensate for vast differences in cost-of-living between regions. More talking point drivel.

No, the real slip up is the admission that the Washington goal is a culture of dependence. Washington will provide and we will be under their control. All good things come from the benevolence of our federal government. They dole it out and we are thankful in return.

Mr. Kirk seems to ignore the reality however.

If Texas were to secede we would then have 24 million people who did not have to bear the burden of federal taxation, regulation and restriction. We could use Texas money to fund our schools, our roads and our Medicare. We would not have to beg Washington. Our state taxes would rise but we would no longer have federal taxes. We would be in control and I've got to believe we could administer the situation more efficiently.

We could use our money to build our businesses, grow our economy, conduct our trade and market our products. We could use our own funds to build our roads when and where we need them. We could drill for our own oil, recover our own natural gas, refine our own fuel and generate our own power without restrictions from California eco-freaks.

Mr. Kirk forgets that the money which Washington supplies to Texas comes from Texans in the first place. That is the inadvertent truth which he has let slip. We don't want or need dependence upon his largesse.

The Chicago Way

The nagging question is: would it be corruption if it were right out in front and not done in the backroom or under the table? Is it still corruption if it is blatant and in your face?

Your Bro Would Make A Great Judge If You Vote Right

Quid pro quo is a political fact of life. Support for your measure will come at a cost of support for mine. That's not all that bad if it is done without compromise to principles of either party. If I'm ambivalent about your proposal and you're on the fence about mine, we harm no one if we help each other out.

But if it comes to an envelope of cash for a change in your position then we can all agree that is corruption. We also know that if there is a contract in the future that will make your company bushels of money in return for your vote that would be corruption. We realize that if your support is in return for a lucrative job for your wife and worthless step-son, that would be corruption.

Now, we've got a recalcitrant Democratic representative being wooed to vote for healthcare and coincidentally, his brother is getting a Presidential nomination to a federal judgeship. Maybe the brother is the best man for the job, but only the most biased observer would say that it doesn't have an odor about the transaction. It is unseemly at best and blatantly corrupt at the core.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Hoping For Change

The mind of the committed liberal is a terrible thing to watch. I would be very happy to waste those particular minds. That wouldn't be terrible at all. It could be quite beneficial to my standard of living if their minds were allowed to go dormant and stop thinking up ludicrous plans like this:

Taxing Transportation 'til It Stops

Yes, that comes out of Harvard which you may recall is within the tiny town that is going to single-handedly nudge America down the path toward green energy leadership. See, if only our 300 million people would bring our wheels to a halt then the other 6 billion folks in the world wouldn't matter.

We've already done a magnificent job of screwing up free market principles for our gasoline by refusing to exploit our own natural resources of oil and by denying permits to build new refineries to produce motor fuel. We top it off with a huge dollop of eco-friendly additives, compounds and bio-fuel gimmickry to raise prices higher. Then garnish with federal and state taxes to fund road construction but steal that money for other purposes when it shows up in the treasury.

Now, let's make driving punitive entirely. When no one can drive, that should decisively deal with unemployment because no one will be able to get to work. But that won't matter because we won't have money to buy products which would have been made by those former workers who drove good old American iron to their jobs.

Yes, we've got taxes now being proposed not as the means of providing essential government services. They are now recognized as the perfect means of compelling behavior of the lemmings. This way lies distopia.

Of Course He Means What He Says

When you are in the public eye it is possible to maybe misspeak. It happens to the best of them. But, if over the years you state a position clearly and unequivocally, then the people must believe that you mean what you are saying. Doesn't it?



Which of course leads me to reprise this wonderful piece of music:

Wisdom in a Nutshell

Great thinking can often be characterized by its ability to by synthesized into a brief, pithy phrase that when pondered reveals all.

Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.


The originally ratified Constitution recognized that and consequently only the House of Representatives was popularly elected and that electorate was only white, educated men. We were shield from the ignorance of the mass by appointment of Senators by state legislatures, appointment of an Electoral College with no mention of a popular election to choose our President, and the combination of Presidential appointment and Senatorial ratification of federal judges for our judiciary. We've thrown away those shields in the intervening 220 years.

Each party steals so many articles of faith from the other, and the candidates spend so much time making each other's speeches, that by the time election day is past there is nothing much to do save turn the sitting rascals out and let a new gang in.


That carefully honed thought might be the agenda of the Tea Party Movement. It describes the problem, indicts the behavior, and predicts the outcome all in brief.

Giving every man a vote has no more made men wise and free than Christianity has made them good.


That could well have been the argument that could have scuttled the bestowal of the franchise on eighteen year olds. Or, in the future we could simply review the 2008 election.

It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office.


At last, I've found the reason I got beaten so badly when I ran for state representative in Colorado and for Colorado Springs City council.

No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.


The credo of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed, Dick Durbin, Steny Hoyer, Charlie Rangel, Chuck Shumer, Barney Frank, et. al. has yet to be disproven.

The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.


The number of those folks seems to be growing like the Black Plague at a rat breeding festival.

The theory seems to be that as long as a man is a failure he is one of God's children, but that as soon as he succeeds he is taken over by the Devil.


The total rationale of Democratic Party ideology in a single sentence.

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.


Now we know where Rahm Emmanuel learned it.

Unquestionably, there is progress. The average American now pays out twice as much in taxes as he formerly got in wages.


Unfortunately that isn't the completion of the Obama agenda, it is only the starting point.

When a new source of taxation is found it never means, in practice, that the old source is abandoned. It merely means that the politicians have two ways of milking the taxpayer where they had one before.


Ain't that the truth.

Know who said these things? Just one man. He died in 1956. He defined curmudgeon and was predictably disliked by many. Still, he's worth reading.

Monday, March 01, 2010

Flashback



Roberta X found Wookie Hole when doing a bit of surfing on Roman construction during the days of empire. That caused me to flashback on one of the most remarkable things I saw in Europe. About an hour and a half out of Madrid was the medieval town of Segovia. The attraction was Meson Candido, a legendary restaurant specializing in roast suckling pig and roast baby lamb. What more does one need to trigger a Sunday afternoon excursion?

The Meson was right there at the corner, under the two thousand year old aqueduct. The chubby owner had just pulled up in a Citroen 2CV wagon filled with small wooden crates containing the stars of the days dinner, a dozen baby piglets destined for the oven. Fortunately their demise had already been secured so there was no opportunity to establish an emotional attachment.

They did not die in vain. The meal was incredible, the tinto was tolerable and the post-prandial flan was a delight.



After the repast we drove to the top of the hill to work off some of the calories and toured the castle. It was the model supposedly for the Disneyland fantasy edifice but it was real world. Within there were displays of Spanish armor and you could not help but be amazed at the tiny stature of the warriors who wore such gear into battle. Most were in the range of five feet tall.

A narrow winding stairway within one of the turrets took you to the top of the ramparts where you could overlook the whole town but always the gaze was back to the aqueduct.

Before leaving we stopped at a cafe in the plaza outside the cathedral for a cold drink and a bit of people-watching during the Sunday afternoon strolling. The cathedral exterior was built to impress and the musty interior reflected six hundred years or more of worship and effort in the dozens of chapels and altars festooned with medieval craftsmanship.



The weekend was the bi-centennial of the Declaration of American Independence. I could not help but ponder what new-comers we were to the world stage.

Marginal Mistakes Add Up

The true believer will continue on faith long after all reasonable justification for the belief has been washed away. Never has that been more obvious than with the scrambling of the global warming alarmists. Yet, we don't really see a lot of the erosion in the American media. They have bought into the plans. We've got to look to the British press which apparently is considerably more skeptical that the New York Times:

The Iconic Issues Iced Up

There's just been a few minor mistakes but otherwise the "science is settled" apparently:

OK, they say, it might have been wrong to predict that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035; that global warming was about to destroy 40 per cent of the Amazon rainforest and cut African crop yields by 50 per cent; that sea levels were rising dangerously; that hurricanes, droughts and other "extreme weather events" were getting worse. These were a handful of isolated errors in a massive report


Just those little assertions were false. Nothing much there.

Well, there's also that pesky period that was so much warmer during the Middle Ages, but we'll just overlook that for the greater good:

Almost as revealing as the leaked documents themselves, however, was the recent interview given to the BBC by the CRU's suspended director, Dr Phil Jones, who has played a central role in the global warming scare for 20 years, not least as custodian of the most prestigious of the four global temperature records relied on by the IPCC. In his interview Jones seemed to be chucking overboard one key prop of warmest faith after another, as he admitted that the world might have been hotter during the Medieval Warm Period 1,000 years ago than it is today, that before any rise in CO2 levels temperatures rose faster between 1860 and 1880 than they have done in the past 30 years, and that in the past decade their trend has been falling rather than rising.


See, the important thing is to spend a few trillion dollars hobbling the world economy so that Gore-istas can reap billions of profit out of their "green" industries:

In other words, in crucial respects the IPCC's 2007 report was no more than reckless propaganda, designed to panic the world's politicians into agreeing at Copenhagen in 2009 that we should all pay by far the largest single bill ever presented to the human race, amounting to tens of trillions of dollars.


Now, let's get to the healthcare reform destruction and November elections.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Thrift Blamed

Remember growing up with adages like, "A penny saved is a penny earned" and "Waste not, want not." Apparently that way lies madness in the brave new world.

Over the last fifty years there has been a momentum in Europe for a federalist contintent modeled surprisingly on the assembly of thirteen independent American colonies into a structure like the reviled United States. It started with a European Coal and Steel Community, an organization to build the industries in the decade after the mass destruction of WW II. Then there was the European Common Market, a dropping of customs duties and restrictive tariffs in favor of improved commerce across the continent. That morphed into the European Union which was sort of like a regional United Nations but with less effectiveness than even that bunch of nationalistic misfits.

The crowning achievement was the adoption of the universal currency. Living in Europe you soon realized that you lost money every time you crossed a border. Currency exchange meant you paid more for a format than you could sell it back for and you were always left with a pocket full of effectively unusable money after a trip. A single currency seemed a boon to the populace.

There's no free lunch and no silver lining to a common currency. It is a huge loss of national sovereignty and a drastic reduction of a nation's ability to manage its own economy. When you've got a national monetary standard you are motivated to be cautious with the value of that resource. When your money is buoyed up by the prudent nations you easily slip into bad habits.

That's why Greece is in a state of economic collapse and apparently Portugal and Spain are already on the slide into the same pit.

Don't Change Your Behavior, Get the Others to Be Equally Profligate

The run-away spending and easy credit that fueled the collapse of Greece isn't the problem you see. It's those Germans who value their money, take care of their resources and live within their means. Europe needs Germans to start burning 100 Euro notes for fuel so that they can be in the same boat.

Can we see a similar situation in the US? Haven't we been told repeatedly that we need to distribute "stimulus" money and not use it to pay off our debts or bolster our savings. We need to spend, spend, spend. And then all will be well with the world.

Kool-Aid Party

So, the Speaker of the House is throwing a party. "I want you all to come down to the beach where I will talk to you and then we'll all have a big glass of this wonderful grape Kool-Aid. After which you will then lay down and take a really long nap until you bloat in the sun and flies establish residence in your mouth."

What Part of Representation Doesn't She Understand?

She wants them to get behind the jobs bill which isn't a jobs bill at all but a hand-out to special interests of money we don't have. It has become the way of doing business even though the people have finally realized that government doesn't actually have a big pot of money to dole out. It's our money and we can eliminate the middle man by keeping it in the first place.

She wants them to get a healthcare bill. This is a great quote:

Pelosi told CNN that "in a matter of days" Democrats will have specific legislative language on health care to show to the public and to wavering lawmakers. She predicted voters will warm up to the bill once they understand its details.

"When we have a bill," she said, "you can bake the pie, you can sell the pie. But you have to have a pie to sell"


Excuse me? What is that 2700 page pile of paper they've been hauling around? Isn't that the pie which so many of the recalcitrant Congress-critters have gotten their localized slices of already? They've had a pie and it is over-baked and sour. No one wants to taste it let alone subsist off of it.

This is an election year. The people are wising up. The word is on the street and can be heard everywhere. If they fail to listen it means they aren't representing us and they will be sent home. Ms Pelosi needs to pay attention and read the tea leaves.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Been There, Done Lots of That

If you are still harboring an assortment of tiki glasses from regular visits to Trader Vic's or similar you may skip the rest of this. If you believe that schnappes is a sweet flavored sort of 40 proof candy that college kids "shoot" on binges then you've never been to the real land of schnappes and are excused from further participation. If you ask your waitress for a "martini menu" when you sit down at dinner in a fine restaurant, you've got no dog in the remainder of this hunt.

If, however, you know the difference between reposado and anejo tequilas; that single-malt scotch comes in a wide range of styles and flavors; that bourbon isn't rye; that whiskey isn't whisky; that vodka shouldn't have fruit flavoring; and that cognac and armagnac come from two different places, neither of which is California then you might consider this:

Manly Cocktails Or Maybe Not

There are some issues there. The Rusty Nail is an after-dinner drink. Don't order one when you walk into Joe's Bar and Grill or you'll get your ass kicked. Blended Scotch and Drambuie is fine and the drink is both strong and palatable. I was brought up in the fighter pilot culture where it was called a MiG-15 rather than a Rusty Nail.

A Bloody Mary is certainly a manly drink, but only if it is consummed prior to noon and for the purpose of assuaging a blinding headache resulting from over-doing it the previous night with either a tequila tasting extravaganza or an Afterburner competition. It must have horseradish and it must be decidedly brownish in tone because of plenty of Worcestershire. Fresh lime juice is mandatory.

Negronis are fine fare. Anytime you want, feel good about yourself with a Negroni. Don't downgrade to an Americano. The mere fact that Negronis were invented in Europe and that an option to go without the strong spirits in the drink is called American tells you all you need to know.

Now, let's get to fire. Lighting booze on fire is a fine tradition, but mixing with water and pouring back and forth until the fire goes out is effete theater and not a manly endeavor. Fire to be macho requires that it be atop your glass when you raise it to your mouth and that it remain in the glass after it is drained. That, my friends is an Afterburner. Failure to keep the flame in the glass requires another attempt.

Fill a shotglass with cognac. Light with a match. You may have to heat the surface for several seconds to get it ignited. Raise glass to your mouth and resist the impulse to blow it out. Open wide and in a confident and positive movement pour the flaming booze in. Close mouth, put glass down, examine for vestigial blue flame in glass. Do not hesitate. Do not miss your mouth. Do not let the glass heat up by delaying.

General rules for manly drinking. Manly drinks are either clear or amber. Anything green, red, yellow, blue or pink is not manly. Manly drinks may be garnished but only with one item and it should not be large or sweet. Manly drinks may be on the rocks or straight up, but never order with specifications such as "shaken not stirred." Sorry, James, it simply isn't manly. Manly drinks should have no more than three ingredients and the main one should be at least eighty proof.

Only in California

Recite to yourself the First Amendment. Do it slowly and with concentration. Feel free to look it up if you are no longer familiar with the exact words.

Then read this and be astounded at the sort of twits we are electing to government in this country who will respond to "feel good" proposals from naive adolescents:

We'll All Be Nice Week

I'd like to see folks expand their vocabulary and reduce dependence on a few all-purpose words, but it is a process of education not legislation.

Meanwhile talk like a pirate.

Saturday Morning Disco Flashback

True confession time. I actually had an ivory three piece suit which my wife says made me look like a young Col. Sanders. I never wore it with an open color shirt nor did I ever learn to do the hustle.

If You Didn't Watch Anything

I watched a lot of it. I read the papers afterward. I've seen hundreds of video clips on several TV networks, not the least of which was Fox. I've got Drudge as one of my half-dozen permanent browser tabs for a home page. So, that's why this item stands out:

TIME Magazine Correspondent Palms Off Lies

Only if none of the first paragraph I've written were true could I swallow that. It is absurd.

I mean, Drudge's takeaway from the summit is that the President talked a lot--actually, the President, the Congressional Democrats and Republicans each spoke an equal amount


If you divide the time by thirds you could say that, but Drudge reported that the time favored Dems by more than a two-to-one margin.

Reading between the lines, you can conclude that the Republicans had nothing very interesting, or clever, to say (and were never able to get the President's goat). And that the President was his usual, unflappable, well-informed self.


Reading that between the lines would take suspension of disbelief to a new level. The Bamster's tacky retort to John McCain about the campaign being over, the childish response regarding time split "because I'm the President", the puerile chastizing of Eric Cantor about bringing the Senate bill to the table as a prop, all indicate that the Messiah's thin skin was clearly breached.

Ignoring the wealth of detail which the Republicans introduced as "nothing very interesting" is simply denying what occurred.

To get these things, however, the Republicans would have had to say yes at some point. As in, YES, I'll vote for the bill if you throw in malpractice and pay for it with the money you get from limiting deductability. That is what happens in a negotiation. That is what is supposed to happen in a democracy.


Klein really doesn't get it. To abdicate responsiblilty and take the 2700 page bill as written with the addition of a tax on corporate healthcare benefits to support tort reform would be outrageous. Accepting a crap sandwich for lunch becaue they agree to add ketchup isn't healthy.

When the mainstream media can convolute what happened with a straight face in this manner it is apparent that they are confident that no one reading their drivel has the intellectual capacity to peel a banana.

Friday, February 26, 2010

Memo For Tyler Grady

Just in case he might try again for the fourth consecutive year in 2011, here's some tips for Tyler Grady.

  1. You don't have to be anorexic to rock
  2. The song doesn't start with five iterations of "gonna mess your mind..."





That's how it's done, son.

The Essential Differences

How often have you heard that there is no difference between the two parties? It's Tweedledum and Tweedledee, two sides to the same coin.

Here in two and a half short minutes you can clearly see the fundamental ideological difference between the parties spelled out in language that possibly even the Bamster could have understood had he every shut up and listened yesterday. The dismissal of the statement and shifting of topic at the end indicates he didn't hear and didn't care.



The concept of free enterprise and individual responsibility taking care of problems is the core.

And, as a bonus, in that short interlude you also get a refresher on the original concept of federalism that the Framers gave us. The states can be trusted to do things and in many instances they are the better choice for the activity.

The clip should be mandatory viewing at least once a day for everyone in Congress and all American high school students.

She Needs Constant Watching

Even the liberals of San Francisco must cringe when they watch their US Representative speak. She garbles and convolutes until the obvious inconsistencies pile on top of each other into a mountain of confusion.

Here's a small clip of what I mean:

Entrepreneurship Means Free Enterprise Not Government

Scary isn't it? She apparently has long ago forgotten the meaning of an extra zero in a large number. She doesn't understand that risk and entrepreneurship does not flourish in a heavily regulated government controlled environment. She is lost in a time continuum in which "life of the bill," which is essentially 'til death us do part, is not "almost immediately."

I watched the whole statement yesterday and could not believe that they let her go out by herself without a keeper.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Minute by Minute

Stephen Green at Pajamas Media says it perfectly in his live-blog of the day's event:

This Is Exactly As It Played Out

Similar thoughts had run through my mind, but I couldn't say them so clearly.

The word of the day?

Condescending.

Video From Healthcare Summit

More from this morning at the bipartisan meeting:

Health Summit Half-Time

I'm biased. You all know that. So, my impressions are going to be reflective of that.

There's going to be no change out of this. The presiding officer has been caught by Sen. McConnell after the first 90 minutes with the hard fact that Republicans have had the floor for 24 minutes and Democrats have been speaking for 56. A bit clumsy that.

The Democrats from Congress are almost embarrassing in the superficiality of their emotional appeals. Between recounts of an individual in Hicksville Nevada whose wife had breast cancer and his insurance was running out and rambling accounts of someone else somewhere who was choosing between paying his deductibles and buying groceries, it was tear-jerking but anecdotal and irrelevant to policy solutions.

The President is no better. I just watched Jon Kyl present a fact-filled five minute explanation of the cost impact of the bill and get a response from the Bamster that took fifteen minutes and roamed from his post-college auto clunker insurance that didn't cover him to the generality laced scenario of someone with poor coverage in Nevada sharing worse coverage in New York because the healthy people are the only ones who get covered. He never addressed the facts nor did he seem capable of doing so.

But, he always gets the last word and he dominates the microphone.

The whole show should foster the deepest revulsion among the electorate. But I know that most folks aren't watching and the mainstream media are going to paint it as a tour de force for the white-hatted redistributionists. The sound-bites will be something to behold.

Spitzer Was A Good Guy

They drummed Eliot Spitzer out of office because of hanky-panky with a very exclusive purveyor of exotic entertainments. It was deemed unseemly for the Governor of New York to be cavorting with someone in that occupation and the improbability of him paying for it on his own dime seemed to conjure up visions of purloining state funds for the satyr's dance. Bye-bye Gov!

The replacement was perfect for a state like New York that has given us David Dinkums, gun-free New York City, Mario Cuomo and son enterprises, Chuck Shumer, Hillary Clinton and more. He was black and blind and on the inside of the Democratic Party. What's not to like?

Then about six weeks ago the Democratic Party house-organ, the New York Times, began bleating about resignation, impeachment and scandal in the governor's house. Apparently he had proven to be so marginally competent that he had lost support. The campaign of accusation, implication and innuendo foundered when the governor said he wasn't going anywhere. He stood and demanded that the NYT get factual or shut up.

Well, today they got factual:

Too-Tall Aide, State Police and a Governor's Phone Call

When the right-hand man of the governor gets into clothes ripping, phone breaking and physical assault of women, you've got to notice. When she complains and the state police start making house calls to suggest she shut up, you've got to notice. When the day before her restraining order hearing she gets a call from the governor himself and suddenly withdraws her complaint, you've got to notice.

More and more I begin to appreciate how badly broken our system and our society has become.

Just In Case

Today there's another show under the Washington Big Top. We'll have the usual suspects clog the traffic with a convoy of black Suburbans down Pennsylvania Avenue from the Capital to Blair House then grand entrances and plenty of photo ops to show how they are doing the "will of the people." It's Healthcare Summit Day.

If the will of the people is throwing more of their money at government bureaucrats while surrendering high quality healthcare for a welfare clinic model, then we shall be properly served. But the Bamster appears to be hedging his bet just a tad in anticipation of getting bitch-slapped by the Republican minority leadership.

If I Don't Get It All, I'll Take a Foot in the Door

The stuff he won't touch is the stuff which would make a difference. Tort reform that would reduce the practice of preventive medicine would be effective in lowering costs. Simple, one shot to help with the problem. Nothing will be a panacea for total cure but tort reform would be a giant step. Imagine not having to watch all those mesothelioma lawyer ads on TV! "If you suffered injury or death, please call Joe Bagdonutz to represent you."

Throw in a removal of restrictions on selling healthcare insurance across state lines and you magically get free-market competition which drives prices to actual costs of doing business and keeps profit margins reasonable without being excessive. How logical is that?

But, we get this from the Prince of Darkness:

It would do that by requiring insurance companies to allow people up to 26 years old to stay on their parents' health plans, and by modestly expanding two federal-state health programs, Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, one person said.


Nothing spells progressive policy like programs of dependency. A 26-year old should be self-sufficient with a stable job, his/her own home and probably a family. They should be five years out of college or nine years out of high school and on a career path. But The Man seeks to keep them in the welfare mindset. If they never learn to do for themselves because mommy and daddy do it, then conversion to government dependency is an easy step.

Medicaid and CHIP are two warts on the butt of Medicare that simultaneously suck the funds out of the seniors program and saddle the states with a huge budget burden. Expanding it to more people raises cost and once again encourages a perspective that government will give them all things. It isn't a good goal.

The President's always-on-message press spokesman, Robert Gibbs, offered this misreading of the public mood and spinning of the possible outcomes:

Gibbs argued that it would be wrong to infer from the Massachusetts election that the public does not want any health care reform. Rather, he said, the American people want to see cooperation and action on Capitol Hill.

"I don't think the American people want us to walk away, because they do know this -- if we don't do anything, their premiums will go up," he said. "If we do nothing, health care spending will skyrocket. That's what we have to prevent."


Yes, the Massachusetts slap-down was not a refusal to embrace healthcare as most people clearly said it was. And, failure for government to act and raise spending (hence taxes) by a trillion or two will cause premiums to go up! Excuse me, Gibbsie, put if I have to pay a lot more in taxes, my premiums have most assuredly gone up. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Shoe's Other Foot

Is it only hypocrisy when the other side does it?

Only Numbers

It gets tougher and tougher to ignore the mood of the electorate. Here's the latest on how the people are feeling about their legislature:

Record-Setting 10% Love Their Congress

That sort of a poll would lead a prudent person to believe that more than simply Tea Party conservatives and gun-loving Rednecks are noticing.

It would also be a very clear indictment of the leadership which the majority party has put in place in the two chambers.

If they had taken a vote of the 7th Cavalry after the Little Big Horn, my guess is that they wouldn't have re-elected George Armstrong Custer.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Sauce For Your Goose

Did you hear the one about the provincial Premier in Canada, land of the potential model for US healthcare reform, that came to the US when he needed some surgery? Here's the whole story:

My Heart, My Health, My Life, Poor You

See, that's the way it works. The state provides healthcare for the people as regulated by the government. It is the "best" at least when it come to you peons. Now if that means the cheapest way into the heart is by ripping through your ribs and sternum the way they used to do it thirty years ago, then so be it. But, if the tall dog in the province needs a little tune-up, they do it where the diagnostics are up-to-date and modern.

Is that just a bit hypocritical? Sort of like the current machinations of the US Congress?

ROE

I lived an ROE nightmare. We fought a war with a loose-leaf binder holding Rules of Engagment that changed almost daily and was filled with constantly changing map coordinates of prohibited targets and allowable free-fire zones. You could fight and kill MiGs in the air, but you couldn't attack the airfields. You could engage them until they went into the 20 mile ring around Hanoi or ten miles around Haiphong or within twenty miles of the Chinese border. You had to visually identify them even when you were equipped with weapons that could shoot beyond visual range.

SAMs sites could be built with impunity and only attacked after completion and when they fired upon you. Gun emplacments could be attacked unless they were on dikes or near certain buildings. Targets that looked very lucrative were passed by on the way to insignificant ones because the President and his SecDef were only gradually increasing pressure on the enemy. We lost a lot of guys doing that.

It's at least that bad today:

You Have the Right to an Attorney

The enemy doesn't wear a uniform or carry a Geneva Convention card. He strikes at random and often remotely without concern for who might be in the area at the time. Death and destruction rather than military efficiency are his motives. He cares not whom he kills because any death is viewed as proper for his cause. He abides by no rules of armed conflict.

He knows our rules as well as we do. He knows our humanitarianism and the ragged line we must walk as we try to gain the confidence of the civilized people of an uncivilized region. He has no compunction regarding the use of unarmed women and children as shield for his activities.

He is winning because we are reluctant to fight a war and would rather play to the press. Young men will be frustrated and die because of this.

Arrival of the Exorcist?

Maybe here is a hero to drive the devils out:

Probe Demanded by Inhofe

I particularly am intrigued by how this might play out:

Senator Inhofe also called for former Vice President Al Gore to be called back to the Senate to testify.

“In [Gore's] science fiction movie, every assertion has been rebutted,” Inhofe said. He believes Vice President Gore should defend himself and his movie before Congress.


Can they withdraw an Academy Award and a Nobel Prize for fraud?

Oak Stakes, Silver Bullets, Mirrors and Holy Water Needed

As we shiver and sneeze waiting for the next snow-storm to blanket places that don't usually get much snow, the vampires of the global climate change movement continue to return. How can we hope to slow this movement into the 18th century?

What we need apparently is another government agency and another web site to tell us the latest in offical doctrine on the evils of carbon and continued energy consumption to transport our goods and light our homes. Let us get some consumption taxes in place lest anyone become successful in the future.

Shared Nobel Laureate Takes Control of Climate Propaganda Office

Why do I continue to return to the belief that taxing our emissions and hobbling our industrial growth is not the recipe for job creation or economic recovery? Why is it that no one seems to appreciate the small impact that unilateral crippling of our society in the US will have on the world's temperature? What makes it so difficult to stand back and begin to honestly appraise the data after we've removed the filters which have made it so corrupted and suspect in the recent past?

How's this for standard talking point blather:

According to Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, the office will "help tackle head-on the challenges of mitigating and adapting to climate change. In the process, we'll discover new technologies, build new businesses and create new jobs."


Yes indeed my ignorant rubes, we'll adapt to climate change apparently meaning we'll do without air conditioning or running water. And, in the process, we'll stop aging, cure teen-aged acne, put a chicken in every pot and add a four hundred pound non-disposable battery to the trunk of every car.

Mr. Karl is up to his elbows in the scandal according to co-researchers:

But Roger Pielke Sr., a climatologist affiliated with the University of Colorado who has crossed horns with Karl in the past, says his appointment was a mistake. He accused Karl of suppressing data he submitted for the IPCC's most recent report on climate change and having a very narrow view of its causes. ...

One of the key areas of dispute, he said, was in describing "recent regional trends in surface and tropospheric temperatures," and the impact of land use on temperatures. It is the interpretation of this data on which the intellectual basis of the idea of global warming hangs.

In an interview, Pielke reiterated that Karl "has actively opposed views different from his own." And on his Web site last week, he said Karl's appointment "assures that policy makers will continue to receive an inappropriately narrow view of our actual knowledge with respect to climate science."

He said the people who run the agencies in charge of climate monitoring are too narrowly focused, and he worries that the creation of the new office "would give the same small group of people the chance to speak on the issue and exclude others" whose views might diverge from theirs.


Apparently the administration has appointed a true believer to direct the propaganda arm and he will brook no disagreement with his view of decided science.

Can anyone drive a stake through the heart of these vampires? Are there any silver bullets to deal with these zombies? What will it take to slow the slide?

You Might Have Missed It

If you went to bed after ice dancing last night, you might have missed this biathlon action.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Not Taking NO For An Answer

The man simply cannot hear. That must be it. He is supposed to be quite intelligent so that means if he could hear, he would understand.

More For Everyone For Free

Well, yes, the CBO does admit that getting healthcare for 31 million more people will cost a paltry trillion dollars but it will be "offset"! Apparently "offset" is some kind of magical technique that allows you to pay for everything and not have it cost you a cent. In the real world that means you want to get something and will require someone else to pay for it. In government, that means new taxes and lots of them.

House Minority Leader Reacts

It would be hard to disagree when you find the Messiah sticking with stuff like this:

Medicare hospital insurance and the Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Fund will increase respectively by increasing the rate for "high-income households" -- $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for married couples filing jointly -- and by taxing unearned income like dividends, interest, annuities, rents and royalties.


Only in a Wonderland world would someone try to keep a straight face while describing "dividends, interest, annuities, rents and royalties" as unearned income. I get some royalty checks. They aren't huge but believe me they were earned with a lot of hard work. Investing to gain dividends and interest requires work to earn the money to invest. Hardly unearned. Rents are paid for property that someone owns, which means they earned it.

Any other interpretation is a facade for socialism and confiscation of wealth.

Obama is also hoping to allow the government to deny or roll back egregious insurance premium increases that infuriate consumers.


In Bamster World, the customer can be infuriated whenever they wish to pay less for a product than the provider wants. There apparently is no relationship to what the costs are for the provider or what margin of profit is required to stay in business or what efforts must be made to compete in a free market. No, in his Harvard perspective, prices are governed simply by what feels good. Business is there simply to meet needs and not offend government or masses without regard to whether they can succeed.

The bright side to this is at the end of a tunnel over the ensuing months until the November election. If the fool on the hill and his slavering minions in the legislature continue to be hard of hearing, they are going to drive a huge defeat for that bunch. If only we can survive through the experience.

Roller Derby Meets Full Contact Stock Car Figure 8

What ever became of the Olympics? Remember those global athletic gatherings that brought amateurs together to compete in feats of strength, speed, endurance and agility? Apparently it has been overcome by marketing and mayhem.

If you were to watch television this past week you would have seen the lion's share of coverage devoted to entertainment rather than athletic competition. The slide has been going on for a couple of decades, but it appears to have culminated in Vancouver.

Ice dancing isn't athletics, is it? There is a skill and agility competition for two people on skates already. It is called "pairs." When you skip the complex jumps and spins in favor of exotic costumes, half-naked women looking like rejects from "Dancing With the Pigs" and mandatory music rather than background accompaniment for athletics, you've got Ice Capades or Disney on Ice entertainment. Fascinating, but not Olympics is it? And is it just me or does American champ Meryl Davis look like a Na'avi with a Micheal Jackson retone job?

Bobsled has always been a favorite for me but the need for an expensive custom venue and a $100,000 vehicle has always raised it a bit above what aspiring Olympians might work on at the local park. Now we've got the world's fastest track and the accidents are piling up in all of the sliding sports.

Is It Sport or Is It NASCAR

Kick off the Olympic games with a luge death and you can only imagine how that bumps up viewership for luge, skeleton (catchy name that,) and bobsled.

For two days we had the dramatic flying of ski-jumpers. There used to be a 70 and 90 meter hill but apparently the concepts need dumbing down for the mouth-breathing audience of Rio Lindo. Now it is the "normal" hill and the "large" hill. The large hill is bigger than normal I understand. Seeing men leap off the slide and fly through a six second descent of more than 200 feet then land without breaking every bone in their body is entertainment.

Hockey went pro a couple of years ago just as basketball did in the summer games. No one wants to watch amateur athletes compete when you can have professional thugs from the major teams on the ice. The thrill of the miracle on ice will never be repeated.

Extreme skiing has been in the games for two cycles now. Half-pipe and free-style events are entertainment not athletics. When Shaun White builds a half-million dollar facility to train then I've got to think that it is more about TV than sports.

Last night it was yet another example of entertainment over athletics when "ski cross" debuted. I couldn't help but think of tractor pulls and monster truck shows in the local rodeo ring when I saw the man made track and watched the four-somes play roller derby jammers down the hill.

Is there some merger between the Olympic Committee and WWE in the offing?

Sunday, February 21, 2010

The Great Flydini

Magic doesn't come easy. It takes years of training to master some illusions:

Poor Draft Choice

The next presidential election is quickly becoming one that is the Republican Party's to lose. Dissatisfaction with the administration coupled with the tone-deaf operation of the Democratic majority in the legislature is bringing a return to tradtional conservative principles reflected in the Tea Party movement. There is a strong feeling of toss the incumbents rising across the country.

The Tea Party is not a political party and not likely to become one. There are too many structural obstacles in place for them to emerge as a ballot entry other than as write-ins. But, the return to the awareness of traditional conservatism as dominant rather than social conservative agenda issues is fueling not only Republicans but moderates and unaffiliated voters as well.

The ideas of low taxes, minimal government, strong defense, and robust free-market opportunities are attractive for a population tired of increasing debt, the rising welfare culture and oppressive government regulation. It's time.

That's why the straw poll at the CPAC gathering this week is a bit disturbing:

Young Voting Cohort Grabs at Strange Standard-Bearer

Ron Paul is controversial at best and certifiably strange at worst. He performed dismally during the primary season leading up to the 2008 elections. He isn't a dynamic leadership figure and his ideology is a mix of strict libertarianism and international isolationism. Those concepts have a perverse attractiveness to people who are simply tired of the current situation and don't really go into too much depth about what needs to be done to govern America in the 21st century. He epitomizes the "anti" concept of voting.

The slate of potential candidates being weighed in the poll is sparse and there isn't much to guide a choice beyond personalities and fleeting glimpses. Mitt Romney fits the traditional mold of long time pol who is first in line for his turn at the nomination. That old-style method of Republican choice is reminiscent of the system that gave us McCain, Dole, Bush 41, Nixon, etc. Something different needs to happen this cycle.

Palin, Pawlenty and Pence are new on the scene and beyond being young, attractive and a current focus of horse-race handicappers there isn't much to base a choice on policy-wise.

Top that off with the passing comment in that news item that 54% of the participants were in the 18-25 age cohort and I've got to say that the poll outcome doesn't rise to the barest bottom rung of the significance ladder.

Lack of Assimilation

The opportunity to gain a higher education at an American university has long been a cherished one. To gain the benefits of our society with the possibility of succeeding and living a good life should be appreciated. To listen and learn from others who have more experience, more education and a different perspective is the purpose of the university experience.

Yet, there is an increasingly visible element in western societies in Europe and the United States which is not interested in doing that. They don't appear to seek assimilation in our culture but rather to convert our culture into one of their choosing. In the process they adopt the tactics and techniques of the terrorist and thug.

This occured about ten days ago at the University of California--Irvine:

Saturday, February 20, 2010

From Another Wonderland

I've never been much of a Tim Burton fan. I can take him or leave him. The talent is obvious but the genre of Grinches and Halloween hauntings in darkest cartoonery isn't my cup of tea. But, speaking of tea parties, this week-end we've got psychedelic meets psychopathic with the relase of Alice in Wonderland.

Kids probably don't read Lewis Carroll's delightful story anymore. They don't read anything these days except text messages and Tweets. Maybe after being technologically awed by this story of pills, madness, elixirs and beheadings, they will be enticed to seek out Alice's Adventure in Wonderland on their ebook reader.

The reviews are in and they somehow reflect the unfamiliarity of the entire generation with the history. Yesterday I saw a blogger breathlessly expounding on the truth that during the period that the book was written there really were mad hatters. Hatters, lacking OSHA to protect them, were commonly driven mad by exposure to the mercury which they used to cure fur into felt for hats.

Here's some comment on the flick:

Wonderland is Like Weird, Ya Know?

It is weird. Ostensibly it was a "nonsense tale" created to entertain Alice and two friends on a road trip in old England. At that level it is fantasy of a high level and entertaining in its own right.

But, many critics have been successful at overlaying a rich political commentary on the book. Certainly there was a monarchy under Queen Victoria who was recognizably a bit weird when viewed from some angles. And there is the mad hatter business.

You could start at that jumping off point and begin to associate other characters in the book with real-life actors in the political scene. The Cheshire Cat would be a Victorian counterpart to our own Bamster; a hollow entity, mouthing platitudes and without substance easily disappearing into nothing but a huge grin.

Eric Holder might have said this:

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less."


Nancy Pelosi has been know to utter profundities such as these:

"I quite agree with you," said the Duchess; "and the moral of that is--'Be what you would seem to be'--or if you'd like it put more simply--'Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise.'"
"I think I should understand that better," Alice said very politely, "`if I had it written down: but I can't quite follow it as you say it."
"That's nothing to what I could say if I chose," the Duchess replied, in a pleased tone.
"Pray don't trouble yourself to say it any longer than that," said Alice.


And hardly a press conference goes by that we don't get some of this from Robert Gibbs playing the Dodo:

Forward, backward, inward, outward, come and join the chase! Nothing could be drier than a jolly caucus-race. Backward, forward, outward, inward, bottom to the top, never a beginning there can never be a stop to skipping, hopping, tripping, fancy free and gay, I started it tomorrow and will finish yesterday. Round and round and round we go, and dance for evermore, once we were behind but now we find we are be-forward, backward, inward, outward, come and join the chase! Nothing could be drier than a jolly caucus-race. For backward...


It would have taken a fertile imagination for Lewis Carroll to come up with such a rich fantasy on his own. But if he looked at the political scene, it would merely have been the more mundane task of ordering the characters into a meaningful sequence and then letting them speak their minds.

Saturday Morning Swing

A plan for the evening:

Friday, February 19, 2010

Still Not Getting It

The Bamster is the President of the United States. He is the Head of State and the singular figurehead of the American government. If an alien saucer landed outside of Roswell and a little green man said, "Take me to your leader," we'd shuttle him to the Oval Office.

In that role there is a need for protocol, sophistication, and that nebulous old concept, "class". A novelist under the nom-de-plume of Trevanian wrote a couple of books in the late '70s; The Eiger Sanction, The Loo Sanction, and one set in Asia titled Shibumi. The concept of shibumi was one of understated elegance and class. Grace under pressure.

Shibumi doesn't respond in kind. Shibumi never descends to name-calling or blame-laying. Shibumi knows what is appropriate in the situation. Shibumi doesn't elbow ahead in line or inconvenience an entire city so that an individual can go out to dinner and a play. Shibumi doesn't give the Queen of England an iPod or return a statue of a beloved statesman such as Churchill.

Here's a picture that demonstrates what shibumi isn't. You'll have to go to the link because it is a restricted picture and I can't post it here. But click through and see what I mean:

Bye-Bye Lama. Chavez and Ahmedindjad Only Get the Front Door

Is the President intentionally an embarrassment? Isn't there a protocol staff left among all of those czars? What was he thinking?

Circumstantial Evidence

What do we know and what don't we know? There remain a lot of holes and if someone has read any Presidential biographies you know that holes like that are not the norm for successful politicians at this level.

Is some of this circumstantial and inference? Of course. Is there fact in the mix? Absolutely. Does it make a case? We'll have to wait and see:

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Why Don't I Feel More Secure

She's been in the job for a while now. She's brought us some great policy trial ballons like no blankets or pillows in airliners. No peeing during the last hour of flight. No reading of books either. Well maybe just a little bit because even the lapdog media thought those were ill-advised, ineffective and ridiculous. At least it shows she's trying.

But, she assured us that the system worked on the BVD Bomber episode until she thought it through and realized it didn't. At least we know she is thinking about it either before or after she speaks.

Yesterday it was announced that selected participants with no shoes, no belts, a lap-top in a separate tray drifting down the conveyor to a waiting thief and a briefcase full of important documents following close behind will be asked to have our hands swabbed for explosive residue detection.

This Will Wash Off in a Week or Two

Now, I've got ask what happens in this scenario. You are legally transporting a firearm in your secured checked baggage. It is properly in a locked hard case and separate from the ammunition. It has been declared and you have dutifully opened it, demonstrated that it is unloaded and replaced it in the locked case and your baggage which is now tagged and sealed. You've just be handling a used firearm with powder residue inevitably still present despite conscientious cleaning. Yep, you're going to be positive when swabbed.

Today we've got this:

It Must Have Got Lost or Maybe My Dog Ate It

They "lost" 200 guns in a year? Handguns, shotguns and rifles? These are security experts who are licensed to carry loaded weapons throughout our society? What's with these buffoons? Consider that most citizens upon finding a gun in a bowling alley, restroom, snack-bar or curbside would turn it in to the slack-jawed guy in the cheap sportcoat and polyester tie standing near by. He looks like a Fed so it must be his. That means probably a lot more than the 200 were mislaid or overlooked but the "security" officer got rescued.

If you really want something to ponder, however, consider this:

Although the number of guns lost is only a small fraction of Homeland Security's 190,000 firearms, any lost weapon "is a very serious matter,"


How many? They are nearly half the size of the current US Army active duty component. Do they really need that many armed goons? And, if they do, is Janet Napolitano the general who should be in command?