Friday, February 19, 2010

Circumstantial Evidence

What do we know and what don't we know? There remain a lot of holes and if someone has read any Presidential biographies you know that holes like that are not the norm for successful politicians at this level.

Is some of this circumstantial and inference? Of course. Is there fact in the mix? Absolutely. Does it make a case? We'll have to wait and see:

2 comments:

Murphy's Law said...

I have just shared this with some of my more liberal neighbors via our community discussion forum. (The same one they used to bash Bush for so many years, only to suddenly declare it "off limits" for politics as soon as Obama took office.)
There will be more nasty replies and e-mails, and I won't get invited to some parties, but it's fun for me and other people may actually learn something an/or circulate it farther.

LauraB said...

Those last few moments were interesting, indeed. And surely not correct. There can be no way he has managed to get that past vetting...