One Juror Blocked the Verdict
That's the way our system works. You compile a jury of twelve and it only takes one of them to corrupt the process. We've all seen "Twelve Angry Men" and know how the single principled and objective individual saves the verdict through logic and argument.
But we don't see any logic and argument in this.
"We'd listen to a tape and people would be like, 'wow, that just confirms that he's guilty' and she'd say, 'that just confirms to me that he's not guilty,'"
I sort of wish that Blago would have had an organization capable enough of executing a true Capone. Only having one drone on your payroll who simply denies what the eleven others are hearing in Blago's own voice without objective basis for the denial is way too basic. You would think they could have mustered four or five venal Chicagoans with a lust for a few hundred thou and a chance to go to a White Sox game with the former Gov. and Rahm Emanuel.
2 comments:
For another take on the subject, go to:
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/congratulations-gov-blagojevich/
"What Blago did do was stand up to Bank of America and threaten to cancel all their state accounts in Illinois… and that they could NOT allow."
I don't like the SOB and am not defending him, but this White House has a history of throwing useless (to the Cult of The One) people under the bus.
Worth a look. Then make up your mind.
Whataguy, that Blago!
He knew full well that (under Chicago rules) that Senatorial seat wasn't his to sell. The governor (Blago) is entitled to a kickback of only 7-10 percent of the total proceeds from the sale. That seat was the property of the former Senator (Obama) - and his alone to sell!
Post a Comment