I tend to dismiss these as the sort of aberrations that occur in a nation of 300 million people which is increasingly less sophisticated and daily immersed in a culture of numbing violence. I've known dozens of cops at all levels during my life and found them to be hard-working, dedicated, and generally constructive individuals. There might be a dull knife or two in the drawer, but there are a majority of mature, trained and prepared public servants. I'm not paranoid about the police...yet.
Certainly, we know that the police have authority and the tools of violence at their disposal. The potential always exists for misuse. It isn't unreasonable to wonder if they will be with the good people of America or will be co-opted by an authoritarian regime. Will they keep their oath or will they succumb to the temptations of the oppressors? It has happened too many times in history to be ignored.
That's why I grabbed this link from one of the comments at View From the Porch. It is Sir Robert Peel's "Principles of Policing"
Principles of policing
1. The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder.
2. The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions.
3. Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public.
4. The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.
5. Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law.
6. Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient.
7. Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
8. Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary.
9. The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.
When we recall that Sir Robert is the "Bobby" for whom the British bobbies are named and that they were long known for performing their police functions without firearms, we can appreciate how effective these principles can be.
The knowledge that a small number of police can only be effective when supported by the large number of the populace does much to reinforce the Hobbes principle that power to govern can only come from consent of the governed. It is not imposed upon the citizens but granted by the governed to those whom they select to govern them.
3 comments:
The Troopers are essentially guided by the same - to enforce through presence, not necessarily through action.
This does not prevent a number of nastier encounters with the few newbies who are still "running down the hill". Nor will it improve as the qualifications - and disqualifiers - are edited in order to get the ranks filled.
We here in NZ are getting pulled in the same direction.
Like the British, our police do not wear sidearms though they do carry weapons in some patrol cars.
The police are well liked and respected by the public. Our firearms laws are quite liberal, the owner being licensed not the weapon.
I like to hunt and with my standard license own 3 hunting rifles. I also own an air rifle which DOESNT require a license to own.
My neighbour shoots competition and with his special license owns two pistols (very few pistols in NZ), an M14 and military shotgun.
He can only use the pistols on a club range but could hunt with the
other two weapons if he wished.
The system works. The public like it and so I believe do the police.
Last year we had a police officer killed with a high powered air rifle (no license required). Last week we had a police dog killed by a similar weapon and a cop wounded by it.
The general outcry has been for better police access to firearms and not tighter gun laws, apart from the air rifle aspect.
I dont think either the public or the police want to go there but the pressure is on.
Post a Comment