Here's one woman's interpretation. You saw it yourself. You've seen it in context. It flows and there isn't much mistake available in interpreting what he said:
You Didn't Build It
There's nothing particularly American about roads and bridges and an educational system. That couldn't have been the distinctive advantage that he refers to. He's discounted the entrepreneurial spirit and he certainly eschews the profit motive which he has called obscene too many times to recount.
But, he walks it back and accuses everyone who can see and hear and read of taking out of context.
It's Bogus
Wouldn't it be refreshing to have him say something meaningful in public and then not to have a week of reshaping, denial, walk-back and explanations? Can't he consistently say what he means, mean what he says and then follow through? Is there really so little "there" there?
6 comments:
Ed,
Yes.
No.
Yes.
Nov 6th 2012, Anybody but Obama.
Maybe it's because we're all just too damn stupid to understand a real genius like him.(except for the media)...NOT!!!!
I think this is going to be Obama's legacy - just like when Al Gore claimed to have invented the internet.
Since I'm not an entrepreneur myself, I refrained from righteous indignation when the zero first made that idiotic speech.
But now the essobe has the unmitigated gall to insult our intelligence, mine included, by saying he was talking about roads - when what he said, in context, is clear to anyone with eyes and ears.
And that does make me angry.
+1 on Juvat!
General Olds, Major Rasimus and all the other warriors that fought communism in SEA could not have imagined that the White House would someday be occupied by a radical liberal. It appears Senator McCarthy and President Nixon weren't as paranoid as everyone thought.
Post a Comment