The Washington Post opinion page breaks ranks with the administration by taking some well-aimed shots at the Attorney General, aka "Shyster to the Messiah."
Right For Some and Wrong For Others
Apparently the writer is on my sheet of music. How can the "Rule of Law" and equal justice be applied by New York criminal court trials for one handful of terrorists and military tribunals be acceptable for that other bunch over there?
How can the evidence gained by enhanced interrogation techniques be unreliable and immoral last week and now the basis of assured conviction?
How can a presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law be squared with AG Holder's assurances that these terrorists are guilty?
This is simply not going to work out well. Have no doubt of it.